Open Access Journal Article

An Operational Framework for a Low-carbon, Green Growth Economy: CO-STIRPAT Dynamic System

by Ick Jin a,* orcid
Director General, Economic Analysis Department of the National Assembly Budget Office, Seoul, Korea
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 October 2023 / Accepted: 12 November 2023 / Published: 15 December 2024


This paper presents an operational framework for assessing the trajectories of production, energy, emissions, and capital accumulation to ensure the implementation of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). The framework combines widely used methodologies (STIRPAT, system dynamics, and optimization) to simulate the pathways of variables until a target year. The CO-STIRPAT dynamic system allows us to identify the spillover pathways from carbon policy to economic growth based on output optimization principles; to conduct a more systematic analysis of the interconnections between the main drivers that determine carbon emissions; to develop a cost-effective climate policy mix that is a backbone for the right combination of carbon pricing, energy efficiency, and carbon intensity; and to assess NDC targets with respect to ambition gaps, implementation gaps, and feasibility.

Copyright: © 2024 by Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Jin, I. An Operational Framework for a Low-carbon, Green Growth Economy: CO-STIRPAT Dynamic System. Journal of Economic Analysis, 2024, 3, 79.
AMA Style
Jin I. An Operational Framework for a Low-carbon, Green Growth Economy: CO-STIRPAT Dynamic System. Journal of Economic Analysis; 2024, 3(4):79.
Chicago/Turabian Style
Jin, Ick 2024. "An Operational Framework for a Low-carbon, Green Growth Economy: CO-STIRPAT Dynamic System" Journal of Economic Analysis 3, no.4: 79.
APA style
Jin, I. (2024). An Operational Framework for a Low-carbon, Green Growth Economy: CO-STIRPAT Dynamic System. Journal of Economic Analysis, 3(4), 79.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics


  1. Ahmad, Salman, Razman Mat Tahar, Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki, Abu Bakar Munir, and Ruzairi Abdul Rahim. (2015). Role of Feed-in Tariff Policy in Promoting Solar Photovoltaic Investments in Malaysia: A System Dynamics Approach. Energy 84, 808–815.
  2. Al-Refaie, Abbas, and Dua’a Younes Abdelrahim. (2021). A System Dynamics Model for Green Logistics in a Supply Chain of Multiple Suppliers, Retailers and Markets. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling 12(3), 259–281.
  3. Ang, B. W., and F. Q. Zhang. (2000). A Survey of Index Decomposition Analysis in Energy and Environmental Studies. Energy 25(12), 1149–1176.
  4. Arrow, K. J., H. B. Chenery, B. S. Minhas, and R. M. Solow. (1961). Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency. The Review of Economics and Statistics 43(3), 225–250.
  5. Aslani, Alireza, Petri Helo, and Marja Naaranoja. (2014). Role of Renewable Energy Policies in Energy Dependency in Finland: System Dynamics Approach. Applied Energy 113, 758–765.
  6. Aslani, Alireza, and Kau-Fui V. Wong. (2014). Analysis of Renewable Energy Development to Power Generation in the United States. Renewable Energy 63, 153–161.
  7. Commoner, Barry. (1971). The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology. First Edition. New York: Random House Inc
  8. Daneshgar, Sareh, and Rahim Zahedi. (2022). Investigating the Hydropower Plants Production and Profitability Using System Dynamics Approach. Journal of Energy Storage 46, 103919.
  9. Dietz, Thomas, and Eugene A. Rosa. (1994). Rethinking the Environmental Impacts of Population, Affluence and Technology. Human Ecology Review 1(2), 277–300.
  10. Dong, Cong, Xiucheng Dong, Qingzhe Jiang, Kangyin Dong, and Guixian Liu. (2018). What Is the Probability of Achieving the Carbon Dioxide Emission Targets of the Paris Agreement? Evidence from the Top Ten Emitters. Science of The Total Environment 622–623, 1294–1303.
  11. Ehrlich, Paul R., and John P. Holdren. (1972). A Bulletin Dialogue on the ‘Closing Circle’: Critique: One-Dimensional Ecology. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 28(5), 16–27.
  12. Elzen, Michel den, Takeshi Kuramochi, Niklas Höhne, Jasmin Cantzler, Kendall Esmeijer, Hanna Fekete, Taryn Fransen, et al. (2019). Are the G20 Economies Making Enough Progress to Meet Their NDC Targets?.Energy Policy 126, 238–250.
  13. Forrester, Jay W. (1971). Counterintuitive Behavior of Social Systems. Theory and Decision 2(2), 109–140.
  14. Friedlingstein, Pierre, Matthew W. Jones, Michael O’Sullivan, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Corinne Le Quéré, et al. (2022). Global Carbon Budget 2021. Earth System Science Data 14(4), 1917–2005.
  15. Höhne, Niklas, Hanna Fekete, Michel G.J. den Elzen, Andries F. Hof, and Takeshi Kuramochi. (2018). Assessing the Ambition of Post-2020 Climate Targets: A Comprehensive Framework. Climate Policy 18(4), 425–441.
  16. Hsu, Chiung-Wen. (2012). Using a System Dynamics Model to Assess the Effects of Capital Subsidies and Feed-in Tariffs on Solar PV Installations. Applied Energy, Clean Energy for Future Generations, 100, 205–217.
  17. Hwang, YoungSeok, Jung-Sup Um, JunHwa Hwang, and Stephan Schlüter. (2020). Evaluating the Causal Relations between the Kaya Identity Index and ODIAC-Based Fossil Fuel CO2 Flux. Energies 13(22), 6009.
  18. Jeon, Chanwoong, and Juneseuk Shin. (2014). Long-Term Renewable Energy Technology Valuation Using System Dynamics and Monte Carlo Simulation: Photovoltaic Technology Case. Energy 66, 447–457.
  19. Jin, Ick. (2018). “Is ESG a Systematic Risk Factor for US Equity Mutual Funds?” Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 8 (1): 72–93.
  20. Jin, Ick. (2022a). “Systematic ESG Risk and Passive ESG Investing.” The Journal of Portfolio Management 48 (5).
  21. Jin, Ick. (2022b). “ESG-Screening and Factor-Risk-Adjusted Performance: The Concentration Level of Screening Does Matter.” Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 12 (4): 1125–45.
  22. Jin, Ick. (2022c). “Systematic ESG Risk and Decision Criteria for Optimal Portfolio Selection.” The Journal of Portfolio Management 48 (10): 206–25.
  23. Jin, Ick. (2023). Probability of Achieving NDC and Implications for Climate Policy: CO-STIRPAT Approach. Journal of Economic Analysis 2(4), 82–97.
  24. Jin, Ick, and Yunhee Kim. (2017). Analysis of the Impact of Achieving NDC on Public Climate Finance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 7(4), 309–334.
  25. Kaya, Yoichi, and Keiichi Yokobori, eds. (1997). Environment, Energy, and Economy: Strategies for Sustainable. Tokyo ; New York: United Nations Univ
  26. Kim, Jootae, Sungjin Son, and Ick Jin. 2022. “The Effects of Shareholding of the National Pension Fund on Environmental, Social, Governance, and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry.” Sustainability 14 (18): 11788.
  27. Liobikienė, Genovaitė, and Mindaugas Butkus. (2017). The European Union Possibilities to Achieve Targets of Europe 2020 and Paris Agreement Climate Policy. Renewable Energy 106, 298–309.
  28. Liu, Peiran R., and Adrian E. Raftery. (2021). Country-Based Rate of Emissions Reductions Should Increase by 80% beyond Nationally Determined Contributions to Meet the 2 °C Target. Communications Earth & Environment 2(1), 1–10.
  29. Movilla, Santiago, Luis J. Miguel, and L. Felipe Blázquez. (2013). A System Dynamics Approach for the Photovoltaic Energy Market in Spain¤. Energy Policy 60, 142–54.
  30. Nair, Kirennesh, Saleh Shadman, Christina M. M. Chin, Novita Sakundarini, Eng Hwa Yap, and Apurav Koyande. (2021). Developing a System Dynamics Model to Study the Impact of Renewable Energy in the Short- and Long-Term Energy Security. Materials Science for Energy Technologies 4, 391–397.
  31. Perino, Grischa, Johannes Jarke-Neuert, Felix Schenuit, Martin Wickel, and Cathrin Zengerling. (2022). Closing the Implementation Gap: Obstacles in Reaching Net-Zero Pledges in the EU and Germany. Politics and Governance 10(3), 213–25.
  32. Peters, Glen P., Robbie M. Andrew, Josep G. Canadell, Sabine Fuss, Robert B. Jackson, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Corinne Le Quéré, and Nebojsa Nakicenovic. (2017). Key Indicators to Track Current Progress and Future Ambition of the Paris Agreement. Nature Climate Change 7(2), 118–22.
  33. Raftery, Adrian E., Alec Zimmer, Dargan M. W. Frierson, Richard Startz, and Peiran Liu. (2017). Less than 2 °C Warming by 2100 Unlikely. Nature Climate Change 7(9), 637–41.
  34. Roelfsema, Mark, Heleen L. van Soest, Mathijs Harmsen, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Christoph Bertram, Michel den Elzen, Niklas Höhne, et al. (2020). Taking Stock of National Climate Policies to Evaluate Implementation of the Paris Agreement. Nature Communications 11(1), 2096.
  35. Rosa, Eugene A., and Thomas Dietz. (1998). Climate Change and Society: Speculation, Construction and Scientific Investigation. International Sociology 13(4), 421–455.
  36. Smit, Suzanne, Josephine Kaviti Musango, and Alan C. Brent. (2019). Understanding Electricity Legitimacy Dynamics in an Urban Informal Settlement in South Africa: A Community Based System Dynamics Approach. Energy for Sustainable Development 49, 39–52.
  37. Solow, Robert M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1), 65–94.
  38. Sterman, John D. (2001). System Dynamics Modeling: Tools for Learning in a Complex World. California Management Review 43(4), 8–25.
  39. Tziogas, C., and P. Georgiadis. (2013). Investigating the Causalities for Cleaner and Affordable Electricity Production Mix: A System Dynamics Methodological Approach. Chemical Engineering Transactions 35, 649–654.
  40. Waggoner, P. E., and J. H. Ausubel. (2002). A Framework for Sustainability Science: A Renovated IPAT Identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(12), 7860–7865.
  41. Wang, Mansi, Arshed Noman, Munir Mubbasher, Samma Faiz Rasool, and Weiwen Lin. (2021). Investigation of the STIRPAT Model of Environmental Quality: A Case of Nonlinear Quantile Panel Data Analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23(8), 12217–12232.
  42. York, Richard, Eugene A Rosa, and Thomas Dietz. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic Tools for Unpacking the Driving Forces of Environmental Impacts. Ecological Economics 46(3), 351–365.
  43. Gyimah, Justice, Isaac Sam Hayford, Ujunwa Angela Nwigwe, and Erica Odwira Opoku. (2023). The Role of Energy and Economic Growth towards Sustainable Environment through Carbon Emissions Mitigation. PLOS Climate 2(3), e0000116.
  44. Khan, Muhammad Bilal, Hummera Saleem, Malik Shahzad Shabbir, and Xie Huobao. (2022). The Effects of Globalization, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in South Asian Countries. Energy & Environment 33(1), 107–34.
  45. Raihan, Asif, Rawshan Ara Begum, Mohd Nizam Mohd Said, and Joy Jacqueline Pereira. (2022). Relationship between Economic Growth, Renewable Energy Use, Technological Innovation, and Carbon Emission toward Achieving Malaysia’s Paris Agreement. Environment Systems and Decisions 42(4), 586–607.
  46. Sohag, Kazi, Kristina Chukavina, and Nahla Samargandi. (2021). Renewable Energy and Total Factor Productivity in OECD Member Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 296, 126499.
  47. Wen, Jun, Nafeesa Mughal, Jin Zhao, Malik Shahzad Shabbir, Gniewko Niedbała, Vipin Jain, and Ahsan Anwar. (2021). Does Globalization Matter for Environmental Degradation? Nexus among Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Carbon Dioxide Emission. Energy Policy 153, 112230.