Journal Browser
Journal Insights

Frequency: Quarterly

Time to first decision: 2.4 Weeks

Submission to publication: 10 Weeks

Acceptance rate: 26 %

E-ISSN: 2811-0943

Related Journal
Open Access Journal Article

Does the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Reduce ‘Rat Race’? A Natural Experimental Study in China

by Philip Arestis a,* Mianshan Lai b Jiale Yang c  and  Yuexun Zhong c
a
Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
b
China Center for Special Economic Zone Research, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
c
College of Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
JEA  2025 4(3):111; https://doi.org/10.58567/jea04030003
Received: 21 January 2025 / Accepted: 16 April 2025 / Published Online: 14 May 2025

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of an unprecedented education policy called ‘double reduction’ (DR) on students’ performance, with evidence from China. One of the significant changes brought about by this policy is the transition of examination scores from a numerical system to a grading system. We found a junior middle school in a small town in Guangzhou that met the requirements for a natural experiment, and we used such unique data to examine three hypotheses. After the implementation of DR, the ‘rat race’ reflected on the students’ grade is reduced. To examine heterogeneity, we apply quantile regression showing that the high-ability students exert less efforts on the ‘rat race’ than low-ability students. Meanwhile, we also provide possible explanations in terms of this phenomenon. Overall, this study not only does it assess the grading transformation that DR policy induced but also fills the gap in the field of DR from an economic perspective.


Copyright: © 2025 by Arestis, Lai, Yang and Zhong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Arestis, P., Lai, M., Yang, J., & Zhong, Y. (2025). Does the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Reduce ‘Rat Race’? A Natural Experimental Study in China. Journal of Economic Analysis, 4(3), 111. doi:10.58567/jea04030003
ACS Style
Arestis, P.; Lai, M.; Yang, J.; Zhong, Y. Does the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Reduce ‘Rat Race’? A Natural Experimental Study in China. Journal of Economic Analysis, 2025, 4, 111. doi:10.58567/jea04030003
AMA Style
Arestis P, Lai M, Yang J et al.. Does the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Reduce ‘Rat Race’? A Natural Experimental Study in China. Journal of Economic Analysis; 2025, 4(3):111. doi:10.58567/jea04030003
Chicago/Turabian Style
Arestis, Philip; Lai, Mianshan; Yang, Jiale; Zhong, Yuexun 2025. "Does the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Reduce ‘Rat Race’? A Natural Experimental Study in China" Journal of Economic Analysis 4, no.3:111. doi:10.58567/jea04030003

Funding

Youth Fund for Humanities and Social Sciences Research of the Ministry of Education of China (24YJC790084) , Youth Fund of Philosophy and Social Sciences of Guangdong Province (GD24YYJ20)

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Arestis, P.; Lai, M.; Yang, J.; Zhong, Y. Does the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Reduce ‘Rat Race’? A Natural Experimental Study in China. Journal of Economic Analysis, 2025, 4, 111. doi:10.58567/jea04030003
AMA Style
Arestis P, Lai M, Yang J et al.. Does the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Reduce ‘Rat Race’? A Natural Experimental Study in China. Journal of Economic Analysis; 2025, 4(3):111. doi:10.58567/jea04030003
Chicago/Turabian Style
Arestis, Philip; Lai, Mianshan; Yang, Jiale; Zhong, Yuexun 2025. "Does the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Reduce ‘Rat Race’? A Natural Experimental Study in China" Journal of Economic Analysis 4, no.3:111. doi:10.58567/jea04030003
APA style
Arestis, P., Lai, M., Yang, J., & Zhong, Y. (2025). Does the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Reduce ‘Rat Race’? A Natural Experimental Study in China. Journal of Economic Analysis, 4(3), 111. doi:10.58567/jea04030003

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Adams, G. S., and Torgerson, T. L. (1964). Measurement and Evaluation in Education, Psychology, and Guidance.
  2. Athey, S., and Imbens, G. W. (2005). Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences Models. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.311920
  3. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., and Mullainathan, S. (2005). How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.288970
  4. Betts, J. R. (2005). Do Grading Standards Affect the Incentive to Learn? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.76459
  5. Betts, J. R., and Grogger, J. (2003). The Impact of Grading Standards on Student Achievement, Educational Attainment, and Entry-Level Earnings. Economics of Education Review, 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7757(02)00059-6
  6. Boleslavsky, R., and Cotton, C. (2015). Grading Standards and Education Quality. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 7, 248–79. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20130080
  7. Borah, B. J., Burns, M. E., and Shah, N. D. (2011). Assessing the Impact of High Deductible Health Plans on Health-Care Utilization and Cost: A Changes-in-Changes Approach. Health Economics, 20, 1025–1042. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1757
  8. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804618
  9. Burke, M. A., and Sass, T. R. (2011). Classroom Peer Effects and Student Achievement. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1260882
  10. Dai, K. (2023). Double Reduction Policy in Education Industry and Firm Values: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 54, 103696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103696
  11. Dai, M. (2021). Enterprises’ Environmental Performance and Environmental Protection Policy Evaluation. Jinan University.
  12. Donald, S. G., and Lang, K. (2007). Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.2.221
  13. Dubey, P., and Gianakopulos, J. (2010). Grading Exams: 100, 99, 98, … or A, B, C? Games and Economic Behaviour, 69, 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2010.02.001
  14. Duxbury, S. W., and Haynie, D. L. (2020). School Suspension and Social Selection: Labeling, Network Change, and Adolescent Academic Achievement. Social Science Research, 102365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102365
  15. Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social Pathology: A Systematic Approach to the Theory of Sociopathic Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. https://doi.org/10.2307/2571653
  16. Fang, H., Wang, L., and Yang, Y. (2020). Human Mobility Restrictions and the Spread of the Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104272
  17. Figlio, D. N., and Lucas, M. E. (2004). Do High Grading Standards Affect Student Performance? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1815–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00039-2
  18. Fu, C., Ou, H., Mo, T., and Liao, L. (2023). Effect Mechanism of Extracurricular Tuition and Implications on “Double Reduction” Policy: Extracurricular Tuition Intensity, Psychological Resilience, and Academic Performance. Behavioral Sciences, 13, 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030217
  19. Giacomino, D. E., and Akers, M. D. (1998). An Examination of the Differences Between Personal Values and Value Types of Female and Male Accounting and Nonaccounting Majors. Issues in Accounting Education, 13, 565.
  20. Giannola, M., Busso, M., and Berlinski, S. (2022). Helping Struggling Students and Benefiting All: Peer Effects in Primary Education. https://doi.org/10.1920/wp.ifs.2022.222
  21. Gray, T., and Bunte, J. (2022). The Effect of Grades on Student Performance: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment. College Teaching, 70, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1865865
  22. Guo, Y. (2022). The Current Impact of the Double Reduction Policy. In: Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2021). Atlantis Press, 147–152. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220131.026
  23. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., and Markman, J. M., Rivkin, S. G. (2001). Does Peer Ability Affect Student Achievement. Journal of Applied Econometrics.
  24. Hoxby, C. M. (2000). Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  25. Hu, Y., Yuan, J., and Wang, Y. (2021). The Heterogeneous Impact of Extracurricular Tutoring on Academic Performance in Different Subjects for Middle School Students. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 167–178.
  26. Huey, M. E., Silvey, P. R., Vaughan, A. G., and Fisher, A. L. (2022). Assessing the Impact of Standards-Based Grading Policy Changes on Student Performance and Practice Work Completion in Secondary Mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 101211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101211
  27. Spence, M. (1978). Job Market Signaling. In: Uncertainty in Economics. Elsevier, 281–306.
  28. Johnson, B. G., and Beck, H. P. (1988). Strict and Lenient Grading Scales: How Do They Affect the Performance of College Students with High and Low SAT Scores? Teaching of Psychology, 15, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1503_4
  29. Lucas, A. M., and Mbiti, I. M. (2012). Access, Sorting, and Achievement: The Short-Run Effects of Free Primary Education in Kenya. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4, 226–53. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.4.226
  30. Marsh, H.W., Seaton, M. 2015. The Big-Fish–Little-Pond Effect, Competence Self-perceptions, and Relativity: Substantive Advances and Methodological Innovation. In: Advances in Motivation Science. Elsevier, 127–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2015.05.002
  31. McClure, J. E., and Spector, L. C. (2005). Plus/Minus Grading and Motivation: An Empirical Study of Student Choice and Performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500260605
  32. Meyer, B., Viscusi, W. K., and Durbin, D. (2007). Workers’ Compensation and Injury Duration: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. The American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3494
  33. Micha, E., Sekar, S., and Shah, N. (2023). What is Best for Students, Numerical Scores or Letter Grades?
  34. Paredes, V. (2017). Grading System and Student Effort. Education Finance and Policy, 12, 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00195
  35. Poterba, J. M., Venti, S. F., and Wise, D. A. (1995). Do 401(k) Contributions Crowd Out Other Personal Saving. Journal of Public Economics, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)01462-w
  36. Qian, H., Walker, A., and Xu, X. (2023). Running Schools on Two Legs: The Impact of Policy Oscillation on a Public-Private Partnership School in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 100, 102806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102806
  37. Ridener, L. R. (1999). Effects of College Major on Ecological Worldviews: A Comparison of Business, Science, and Other Students. Journal of Education for Business, 75, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832329909598984
  38. Sacerdote, B. (2011). Peer Effects in Education: How Might They Work, How Big Are They and How Much Do We Know Thus Far? In: Handbook of the Economics of Education. Elsevier, 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53429-3.00004-1
  39. Sikora, A. S. (2015). Mathematical Theory of Student Assessment Through Grading.
  40. Song, M. (2022). Under the Implementation of Double Reduction Policy. In: Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2021). Atlantis Press, 800–804. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220131.146
  41. Walvoord, B. E., and Anderson, V. J. (2011). Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment in College. John Wiley & Sons.
  42. Yin, Y., and Lai, Z. (2021). Research on the Transformation of Educational Institutions Under the Policy of Double Reduction. In: Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2021). Atlantis Press, 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211220.258