Open Access Journal Article

Sector-Level Out-of-Sample Performance of the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios Using a Covid-Correction Breakpoint

by M. Ryan Haley a,*
a
Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI, US
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
FEL  2025 4(1):42; https://doi.org/10.58567/fel04010003
Received: 9 November 2024 / Accepted: 21 March 2025 / Published Online: 21 May 2025
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that many mean-variance and shortfall-based optimal portfolio selection fail to out-perform the Naive (1/n) Portfolio in out-of-sample testing. This paper revisits this line of inquiry by applying the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios to 1100 sector-specific S&P 500 re-sampled data sets from the 2007-2021 time frame. Using April 2020 as the baseline train-test split break point, the Naive Portfolio delivers statistically significantly superior Sharpe Ratios in the test data in ten of the eleven sectors. However, the Sharpe Portfolio delivers statistically significantly superior shortfall values in all eleven sectors in the test data. Using March 2020 and May 2020 as alternative breakpoints gave similar results to the baseline analysis. Interestingly, when the data set was truncated at February 2020 (i.e., before the Covid correction) the Sharpe Portfolio returned statistically significantly better Sharpe Ratios than the Naïve Portfolio in the test data in all but the Energy sector; as in the baseline analysis, the Sharpe Portfolio returned statistically significantly superior shortfall values for all eleven sectors. Thus, the Sharpe Portfolio can deliver acceptable out-of-sample performance, but the conditions for success appear to vary by sector and test data erraticism.

Keywords: Optimal Portfolio Selection; Naive Diversification; Portfolio Choice;
Copyright: © 2025 by Haley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Haley, M. R. (2025). Sector-Level Out-of-Sample Performance of the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios Using a Covid-Correction Breakpoint. Financial Economics Letters, 4(1), 42. doi:10.58567/fel04010003
ACS Style
Haley, M. R. Sector-Level Out-of-Sample Performance of the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios Using a Covid-Correction Breakpoint. Financial Economics Letters, 2025, 4, 42. doi:10.58567/fel04010003
AMA Style
Haley M R. Sector-Level Out-of-Sample Performance of the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios Using a Covid-Correction Breakpoint. Financial Economics Letters; 2025, 4(1):42. doi:10.58567/fel04010003
Chicago/Turabian Style
Haley, M. R. 2025. "Sector-Level Out-of-Sample Performance of the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios Using a Covid-Correction Breakpoint" Financial Economics Letters 4, no.1:42. doi:10.58567/fel04010003

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Haley, M. R. Sector-Level Out-of-Sample Performance of the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios Using a Covid-Correction Breakpoint. Financial Economics Letters, 2025, 4, 42. doi:10.58567/fel04010003
AMA Style
Haley M R. Sector-Level Out-of-Sample Performance of the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios Using a Covid-Correction Breakpoint. Financial Economics Letters; 2025, 4(1):42. doi:10.58567/fel04010003
Chicago/Turabian Style
Haley, M. R. 2025. "Sector-Level Out-of-Sample Performance of the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios Using a Covid-Correction Breakpoint" Financial Economics Letters 4, no.1:42. doi:10.58567/fel04010003
APA style
Haley, M. R. (2025). Sector-Level Out-of-Sample Performance of the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios Using a Covid-Correction Breakpoint. Financial Economics Letters, 4(1), 42. doi:10.58567/fel04010003

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., and Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? The Review of Financial studies 22, 1915-1953. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075
  2. Haley, M. (2008). A Simple Nonparametric Approach to Low-Dimension, Shortfall-Based Portfolio Selection. Finance Research Letters 5, 183--190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2008.04.002
  3. Haley, M. (2016). Shortfall Minimization and the Naive (1/N) Portfolio: An Out-of-Sample Comparison. Applied Economics Letters 23, 926–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1119788
  4. Haley, M. (2017). K-Fold Cross Validation Performance Comparisons of Six Naive Portfolio Selection Rules: How Naive Can You Be and Still Have Successful Out-of-Sample Portfolio Performance?. Annals of Finance 13, 341--358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-017-0301-4
  5. Haley, M. R. (2018). A Moment-Free Nonparametric Quantity-of-Quality Approach to Optimal Portfolio Selection: A Role for Endogenous Shortfall and Windfall Boundaries?. Journal of the Operational Research Society 69, 1678-1687.
  6. Haley, M., and Whiteman, C. (2008). Generalized Safety First and a New Twist on Portfolio Performance. Econometric Reviews 27, 457--485. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930801960360
  7. Hwang, I., Xu, S., and In, F. (2018). Naive Versus Optimal Diversification: Tail risk and Performance. European Journal of Operational Research 265, 372-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.066
  8. Kirby, C., and Ostdiek, B. (2012). It's all in the timing: Simple Active Portfolio Strategies that Outperform Naïve Diversification. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 47, 437-467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109012000117
  9. Platanakis, E., Sutcliffe, C., and Ye, X. (2021). Horses for courses: Mean-variance for asset allocation and 1/N for stock selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 288, 302-317.
  10. Roy, A. (1952). Safety First and the Holding of Assets. Econometrica, 20, 431--449.
  11. Sharpe, W. (1994). The Sharpe Ratio. Journal of portfolio management, 21, 49-58.
  12. Stutzer, M. (2000). A Portfolio Performance Index. Financial Analysts Journal, May/June, 52--61.