Journal Browser
Journal Insights

Frequency: Quarterly

Time to first decision: 2.1 Weeks

Submission to publication: 4 Weeks

Acceptance rate: 31 %

E-ISSN: 2972-3272

Announcement more >>
Open Access Journal Article

Geopolitical Challenges and Natural Gas Supply

by Xiaomei Lv a Lunwu Liu a,*  and  Min Bai b
a
International College, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China
b
School of Accounting Finance and Economics, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 February 2025 / Accepted: 4 April 2025 / Published Online: 22 May 2025

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which began on February 24, 2022, on natural gas prices and supply security in major global markets. Six months after the conflict's onset, natural gas prices surged by an average of 78.65% across international markets. Notably, prices in the European Union, Russia, the United Kingdom, Japan, and South Korea saw substantial increases, while price hikes in China, the United States, and Australia were comparatively smaller. Despite these price fluctuations, the security of natural gas supply in key international markets remained largely unaffected. Using the Differences-in-Differences (DID) method, the study analyzed the conflict's impact on supply security, employing a mediation effects model to examine the roles of supply, demand, and price. The findings reveal that the conflict significantly reduced natural gas supply security, with negative effects on both supply and demand, although price changes did not mediate this reduction in supply security. Furthermore, the regional impact on supply security was minimal, likely due to the high integration of the global natural gas market. Overall, the Russia-Ukraine conflict notably influenced natural gas supply security by affecting supply and demand factors.


Copyright: © 2025 by Lv, Liu and Bai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Lv, X., Liu, L., & Bai, M. (2025). Geopolitical Challenges and Natural Gas Supply. Economic Analysis Letters, 4(1), 77. doi:10.58567/eal04010006
ACS Style
Lv, X.; Liu, L.; Bai, M. Geopolitical Challenges and Natural Gas Supply. Economic Analysis Letters, 2025, 4, 77. doi:10.58567/eal04010006
AMA Style
Lv X, Liu L, Bai M. Geopolitical Challenges and Natural Gas Supply. Economic Analysis Letters; 2025, 4(1):77. doi:10.58567/eal04010006
Chicago/Turabian Style
Lv, Xiaomei; Liu, Lunwu; Bai, Min 2025. "Geopolitical Challenges and Natural Gas Supply" Economic Analysis Letters 4, no.1:77. doi:10.58567/eal04010006

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Lv, X.; Liu, L.; Bai, M. Geopolitical Challenges and Natural Gas Supply. Economic Analysis Letters, 2025, 4, 77. doi:10.58567/eal04010006
AMA Style
Lv X, Liu L, Bai M. Geopolitical Challenges and Natural Gas Supply. Economic Analysis Letters; 2025, 4(1):77. doi:10.58567/eal04010006
Chicago/Turabian Style
Lv, Xiaomei; Liu, Lunwu; Bai, Min 2025. "Geopolitical Challenges and Natural Gas Supply" Economic Analysis Letters 4, no.1:77. doi:10.58567/eal04010006
APA style
Lv, X., Liu, L., & Bai, M. (2025). Geopolitical Challenges and Natural Gas Supply. Economic Analysis Letters, 4(1), 77. doi:10.58567/eal04010006

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Bai, M. (2021). Are firm characteristics priced differently between opposite short-sales regimes? International Finance, 24(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.12378
  2. Bai, M., Bai, F., and Qin, Y. (2022). Emerging economies openness and efficiency. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(3), 659-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3413
  3. Bai, M., Cai, J., and Qin, Y. (2021). Ownership discrimination and private firms financing in China. Research in International Business and Finance, 57, 101406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101406
  4. Bai, M., and Ho, L. (2022). Corporate social performance and firm debt levels: Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and institutional environments. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102968
  5. Bai, M., and Ho, L. (2023). How do gold and oil react to the COVID-19 pandemic: A review. Energy & Environment, 34(7), 2876-2902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221150143
  6. Bai, M., Ho, L., Lu, Y., and Qin, Y. (2023). Labor protection and dynamic leverage adjustments in the OECD countries. International Review of Economics and Finance, 83, 502-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.08.015
  7. Bai, M., Li, X.-M., and Qin, Y. (2016). Short-selling constraints and stock-valuation pattern: a regime–event analysis. Applied Economics, 48(56), 5462-5484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1176118
  8. Bai, M., and Qin, Y. (2014). Short-sales constraints and liquidity change: Cross-sectional evidence from the Hong Kong Market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 26, 98-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2013.12.003
  9. Bai, M., and Qin, Y. (2015). Short sales constraints and price adjustments to earnings announcements: Evidence from the Hong Kong market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 42, 304-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.08.002
  10. Bai, M., and Qin, Y. (2015). Commonality in liquidity in emerging markets: Another supply-side explanation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 39, 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.04.006
  11. Bai, M., Qin, Y., and Dasgupta, A. (2022). Does waste disclosure waste? Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/bse.3166
  12. Bai, M., Qin, Y., and Zhang, H. (2021). Stock price crashes in emerging markets. International Review of Economics and Finance, 72(1), 466-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.12.015
  13. Bai, M., and Reece, M. (2023). COVID-19 Pandemic and International Energy Performances. The Journal of Prediction Markets, 17(2), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.5750/jpm.v17i2.2104
  14. Botão, R. P., de Medeiros Costa, H. K., and Dos Santos, E. M. (2023). Global Gas and LNG markets: demand, supply dynamics, and implications for the future. Energies, 16(13), 5223. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16135223
  15. Brown, S. P., and Yücel, M. K. (2008). What drives natural gas prices? The Energy Journal, 29(2), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-No2-3
  16. Cai, W., Bai, M., and Davey, H. (2022). Implementing environmental protection tax in China: An alternative framework. Pacific Accounting Review, 34(3), 479-513. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-02-2021-0020
  17. Chan, Y. T., Punzi, M. T., and Zhao, H. (2024). Navigating geopolitical crises for energy security: Evaluating optimal subsidy policies via a Markov switching DSGE model. Journal of Environmental Management, 349, 119619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119619
  18. Chiţu, L., Ferrari Minesso, M., and Manu, A. S. (2024). Speculation in oil and gas prices in times of geopolitical risks. Economic Bulletin Boxes, 2.
  19. Gupta, R., and Pierdzioch, C. (2022). Forecasting the realized variance of oil-price returns: a disaggregated analysis of the role of uncertainty and geopolitical risk. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(34), 52070-52082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19475-6
  20. Ha, L. T. (2024). A wavelet analysis of dynamic connectedness between geopolitical risk and renewable energy volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic and Ukraine-Russia conflicts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(12), 17994-18009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25288-y
  21. Jiang, H., Qin, Y., and Bai, M. (2020). Short-selling threat and real earnings management – international evidence. Journal of International Accounting Research, 19(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-52639
  22. Khan, K., Khurshid, A., and Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). Energy security analysis in a geopolitically volatile world: A causal study. Resources Policy, 83, 103673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103673
  23. Kong, L. L., Bai, M., and Wang, P. (2015). Is disposition related to momentum in Chinese market? Managerial Finance, 41(6), 600-614. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-08-2014-0222
  24. Lee, C. C., Yuan, Z., He, Z. W., and Xiao, F. (2024). Do geopolitical risks always harm energy security? Their non-linear effects and mechanism. Energy Economics, 129, 107245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107245
  25. Nick, S., and Thoenes, S. (2014). What drives natural gas prices?—A structural VAR approach. Energy Economics, 45, 517-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.08.008
  26. Qin, Y., and Bai, M. (2014). Foreign Ownership Restriction and Momentum - Evidence from Emerging Markets. International Review of Finance, 14(2), 237-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12026
  27. Qin, Y., Pan, G., and Bai, M. (2020). Improving market timing of time series momentum in the Chinese stock market. Applied Economics, 52(43), 4711-4725. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1761534
  28. Qin, Y., Yang, Z., and Bai, M. (2022). Heterogeneous firm-level responses to the US 2018 tariff announcement. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 18(1), 94-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-05-2021-0248
  29. Scholtens, B., and Yurtsever, C. (2012). Oil price shocks and European industries. Energy Economics, 34(4), 1187-1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.05.008
  30. Vivoda, V. (2009). Diversification of oil import sources and energy security: a key strategy or an elusive objective? Energy Policy, 37(11), 4615-4623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.007
  31. Vivoda, V. (2023). Friend-shoring and critical minerals: exploring the role of the minerals security partnership. Energy Research and Social Science, 100, 103085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103085
  32. Wang, Q., Zhang, C., and Li, R. (2024). Impact of different geopolitical factors on the energy transition: The role of geopolitical threats, geopolitical acts, and geopolitical risks. Journal of Environmental Management, 352, 119962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119962
  33. Xiao, L., Bai, M., Qin, Y., Xiong, L., and Yang, L. (2021). Financial slack and inefficient investment decisions in China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(4), 920-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3285
  34. Xiong, L., Xiao, L., Bai, M., Qin, Y., and Yang, L. (2023). The religion effect on corporate cash holding in China: Buddhism and Taoism. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 28(4), 4420-4457. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2639
  35. Yousfi, M., and Bouzgarrou, H. (2024). Geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty, and dynamic connectedness between clean energy, conventional energy, and food markets. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(3), 4925-4945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31492-7
  36. Zhang, B., Liu, Z., Wang, Z., and Zhang, S. (2023). The impact of geopolitical risk on energy security: Evidence from a GMM panel VAR approach. Resources Policy, 86, 104222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104222
  37. Zhou, D., Bai, M., Liang, X., and Qin, Y. (2021). The Early-life Political Event Experience of the Chair of the Board and the Firm's Innovation Decision. Australian Accounting Review, 31(3), 186-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12345
  38. Zhou, D., Zhou, H., Bai, M., and Qin, Y. (2022). The COVID-19 outbreak and corporate cash-holding levels: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 942210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942210