Open Access Journal Article

Observable and Unobservable Investment Information in Multiple Markets

by Yoshikazu Ishinagi a  and  Joonghwa Oh b,* orcid
a
Department of International Relations, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies, Kobe, Japan
b
Faculty of Business Administration, Setsunan University, Osaka, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
EAL  2024, 60; 3(3), 60; https://doi.org/10.58567/eal03030001
Received: 23 January 2024 / Accepted: 27 March 2024 / Published Online: 29 March 2024
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

This study considers the effects of disclosure conditions on firms' investment decisions when facing an identical competitor in multiple markets. Assuming that there are congestion costs between multiple investments to reduce marginal cost for each market, this study focuses on the cases where the disclosure conditions may differ by market. Like previous studies on single Cournot competition, these results show that firms invest more in the observable investment markets than in the unobservable markets under symmetric disclosure conditions. However, firms invest more in the unobservable market if there are asymmetric disclosure conditions.

Keywords: Multimarket contact; cost-reducing investment; congestion cost; disclosure conditions;
Copyright: © 2024 by Ishinagi and Oh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20K02057) , Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20K02042)

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Ishinagi, Y.; Oh, J. Observable and Unobservable Investment Information in Multiple Markets. Economic Analysis Letters, 2024, 3, 60. https://doi.org/10.58567/eal03030001
AMA Style
Ishinagi Y, Oh J. Observable and Unobservable Investment Information in Multiple Markets. Economic Analysis Letters; 2024, 3(3):60. https://doi.org/10.58567/eal03030001
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ishinagi, Yoshikazu; Oh, Joonghwa 2024. "Observable and Unobservable Investment Information in Multiple Markets" Economic Analysis Letters 3, no.3:60. https://doi.org/10.58567/eal03030001
APA style
Ishinagi, Y., & Oh, J. (2024). Observable and Unobservable Investment Information in Multiple Markets. Economic Analysis Letters, 3(3), 60. https://doi.org/10.58567/eal03030001

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Alles, M., and S. Datar. 1998. Strategic Transfer Pricing. Management Science, 44(4): 451-461. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.4.451
  2. Arya, A., H. Frimor, and B. Mittendorf. 2010. Discretionary Disclosure of Proprietary Information in a Multisegment Firm. Management Science, 56(4): 645-658. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1126
  3. d'Aspremont, C., and A. Jacquemin. 1988. Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers. The American Economic Review, 78(5): 1133-1137. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1807173
  4. Bagwell, K. 1995. Commitment and Observability in Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 8(2): 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(05)80001-6
  5. Baik, K., and S. Kim, 2020. Observable versus Unobservable R&D Investment in Duopolies. Journal of Economics, 130(1): 37-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00712-019-00679-3
  6. Bernheim, B., and M. Whinston. 1990. Multimarket Contact and Collusive Behavior. RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555490
  7. Bolton, P., and D. Scharfstein. 1990. A Theory of Predation Based on Agency Problems in Financial Contracting. The American Economic Review, 80(1): 93-106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2006736
  8. Botosan, C., A. Huffman, and M. Stanford. 2021. The State of Segment Reporting by US Public Entities: 1976–2017. Accounting Horizons, 35(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-19-104
  9. Brander J., and B. Spencer. 1983. Strategic Commitment with R&D: The Symmetric Case. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14(1): 225-235. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003549
  10. Bulow, J., J. Geanakoplos, and P. Klemperer. 1985. Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements. Journal of Political Economy, 93(3): 488-511. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1832005
  11. Ciliberto, F., and J. Williams. 2014. Does Multimarket Contact Facilitate Tacit Collusion? Inference on Conduct Parameters in The Airline Industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 45(4): 764-791. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.120
  12. Darrough, M. 1993. Disclosure Policy and Competition Cournot vs. Bertrand. The Accounting Review, 68(3): 534-561. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248200
  13. Evans, W., and I. Kessides. 1994. Living by the ``Golden Rule'': Multimarket Contact in the U.S. Airline Industry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2): 341-366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118466
  14. Gal-Or, E. 1993. Strategic Cost Allocation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 41(4): 387-402. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950599
  15. Graham, J., C. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal. 2005. The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1-3): 3-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002
  16. Hall, B., and R. Oriani. 2006. Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany, and Italy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5): 971-993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.12.001
  17. Hughes, J., and J. Kao. 1998. Cross-Subsidization, Cost Allocation, and Tacit Coordination. Review of Accounting Studies, 2(3): 265-293. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018326914717
  18. Hughes, J., and M. Williams. 2008. Commitments and Disclosure in Oligopolies. The Accounting Review, 83(1): 111-132. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.111
  19. Kopel, M., and E. Putz. 2021. Sharing Managerial Contract Information in a Vertically Related Market. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(4): 1037-1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3290
  20. Lee, D., and J. Oh. 2022. Strategic Commitments of Downstream Investment Firms. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(6): 2098-2107. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3511
  21. Parker, P., and L. Röller. 1997. Collusive Conduct in Duopolies: Multimarket Contact and Cross-Ownership in The Mobile Telephone Industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 28(2): 304-322. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555807
  22. Rey, P., and T. Vergė. 2004. Bilateral Control with Vertical Contracts. RAND Journal of Economics, 35(4): 728-746. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593770