Open Access Journal Article

Can rural human capital inputs enhance agricultural total factor productivity? - Based on the dualistic economic structure perspective

by can wang a,*
a
School of Economics and Management, Northwestern University, Xi 'an, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
REA  2023, 20; 2(3), 20; https://doi.org/10.58567/rea02030005
Received: 5 October 2023 / Accepted: 7 November 2023 / Published Online: 21 November 2023

Abstract

Human factor inputs are key to promoting agricultural modernisation. Traditional economic theory suggests that improving human capital is the key to boosting agricultural productivity, but can this conclusion hold in China's dualistic economic structure? We use Chinese provincial panel data from 2000-2017 to examine the impact of rural human capital inputs on agricultural total factor productivity. We find that, on the whole, rural human capital inputs have a negative effect on agricultural total factor productivity, and that there is a "rural human capital trap". Mechanism analysis reveals that rural human capital inputs, on the one hand, cause labour loss and reduce the quality of agricultural workers, while on the other hand, they may promote the application of mechanization, which has both positive and negative effects on agricultural total factor productivity. Heterogeneity analysis finds that this negative effect is more pronounced in the central region of China because of the serious loss of rural labour. This study provides new policy insights for further improving the structure of rural education inputs and promoting human capital accumulation in agriculture.


Copyright: © 2023 by wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
wang, c. Can rural human capital inputs enhance agricultural total factor productivity? - Based on the dualistic economic structure perspective. Review of Economic Assessment, 2023, 2, 20. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea02030005
AMA Style
wang c. Can rural human capital inputs enhance agricultural total factor productivity? - Based on the dualistic economic structure perspective. Review of Economic Assessment; 2023, 2(3):20. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea02030005
Chicago/Turabian Style
wang, can 2023. "Can rural human capital inputs enhance agricultural total factor productivity? - Based on the dualistic economic structure perspective" Review of Economic Assessment 2, no.3:20. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea02030005
APA style
wang, c. (2023). Can rural human capital inputs enhance agricultural total factor productivity? - Based on the dualistic economic structure perspective. Review of Economic Assessment, 2(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea02030005

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Becker, Gary, S. (1968). Crime and punishment: an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62853-7_2
  2. Coelli, T. J., & Rao, D. S. P. (2005). Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980-2000. Agriculture Economics 31(1), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0169-5150.2004.00018.X
  3. Fang Li, Shuyi Feng, Hualiang Lu, Futian Qu, Marijke D’Haese. (2021). How do non-farm employment and agricultural mechanization impact on large-scale farming? A spatial panel data analysis from Jiangsu Province, China. Land Use Policy 107, 105517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol
  4. Gandhi, A., S. Navarro and D. Rivers. (2020). On the identification of Gross Output production functions. Journal of Political Economy 128(8),2973-2016. https://doi.org/10.1086/707736
  5. Gokul P. Paudel, Dilli Bahadur KC, Dil Bahadur Rahut, Scott E. Justice, Andrew J. McDonald. (2019). Scale-appropriate mechanization impacts on productivity among smallholders: Evidence from rice systems in the mid-hills of Nepal. Land Use Policy 85(03), 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.030
  6. Hall R.E. & Jones C. I. (1999). Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399555954
  7. Jacques C. Julien, Boris E. Bravo-Ureta, Nicholas E. Rada. (2023). Gender and agricultural Productivity: Econometric evidence from Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda. World Development 171, 106365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev
  8. Jianzhi Liu, Yangang Fang, Gang Wang, Bencheng Liu, Ruru Wang. (2023). The aging of farmers and its challenges for labor-intensive agriculture in China: A perspective on farmland transfer plans for farmers' retirement. Journal of Rural Studies 100, 103013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud
  9. Jolliffe D. (2004). The impact of education in rural Ghana: examining household labor allocation and returns on and off the farm. Journal of Development Economics 73(1), 0-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.02.002
  10. Kamaldeen Mohammed, Evans Batung, Sulemana Ansumah Saaka, Moses Mosonsieyiri Kansanga, Isaac Luginaah. (2023). Determinants of mechanized technology adoption in smallholder agriculture: Implications for agricultural policy. Land Use Policy 129, 106666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol
  11. Klenow P J, Rodríguez-Clare A. (1997). The Neoclassical Revival in Growth Economics: Has It Gone Too Far?. Nber Macroeconomics Annual 12, 73-103. https://doi.org/10.1086/654324
  12. Krugman, Paul. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy 99(3), 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
  13. Lewis, W. Arthur. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour. The Manchester School 22(2), 139-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x
  14. Liu, N. (2014). A study on the regional agricultural growth effect of rural human capital loss - based on panel data from 13 major grain-producing provinces and regions. Population and Economy (04), 23-32.
  15. Mesay Gebresilasse. (2023). Rural roads, agricultural extension, and productivity. Journal of Development Economics 162, 103048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco
  16. Mincer J. (1962). On-the-Job Training: Costs, Returns, and Some Implications. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 50-79. https://doi.org/10.1086/258725
  17. Reardon T, Julio Berdegué, Germán Escobar. (2001). Rural Nonfarm Employment and Incomes in Latin America: Overview and Policy Implications. World Development 29(3), 395-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00112-1
  18. Ruan Rongping, Zheng Fengtian. (2009). The "education pump" hypothesis and its test. China Population Science (05), 36-45+111.
  19. SCHULTZ T W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American economic review 51(5), 1-17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1818907
  20. Shouying Liu, Sen Ma, Lijuan Yin, Jiong Zhu. (2023). Land titling, human capital misallocation, and agricultural productivity in China. Journal of Development Economics 165, 103165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco
  21. Sumaryanto, D. S. (2011). Are schooling and roads complementary? evidence from income dynamics in rural indonesia. World Development 39(12), 2232-2244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.003
  22. Yue Hu, Chang Liu, Jiangang Peng. (2021). Financial inclusion and agricultural total factor productivity growth in China. Economic Modelling 96, 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.12.021
  23. Yuegang Song, Bicheng Zhang, Jianhua Wang, Keh Kwek. (2022). The impact of climate change on China's agricultural green total factor productivity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 185, 122054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore
  24. Zhu, Changcun & Jingzhi Ma. (2009). Broad Spillovers of Rural Human Capital and the Rural-Urban Income Gap. China Rural Observation (04), 37-46+96.