Open Access Journal Article

Influencing Factors as well as Implementation Path of Synergistic Development of Digitalization and Greening in Manufacturing Industry: Analysis from a Configuration Perspective

by Haiyong Jiang a,* ,  Yinghui Han a  and  Yan Qin a
a
School of Business, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
REA  2024, 26; 3(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.58567/rea03010004
Received: 10 November 2023 / Accepted: 4 March 2024 / Published Online: 11 March 2024
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

The manufacturing sector must incorporate digitalization and greening as crucial strategies to attain high level of development in the context of the digital economy, given its significant role in quality of environment. Most of existing studies explore net effect of a single or several factors on the digitalization or greening in the manufacturing industry. Limited investigation has been done to integrate various factors impacting the connection and synchronized advancement of digitalization and greening within the manufacturing. Factors affecting the synergy of digitalization and green change within manufacturing are recognized in this article, and a theoretical framework is established to analyze. FsQCA tool is also put into use to survey configurational cases, which contains synergy degree of green digitalization from 30 provinces’ manufacturing in China. Results show that: (1) Between 2007 and 2020, the development level of digital-green integration in the manufacturing industry shows an upward trend. There are three types of collaborative modes, namely, "industrial robot driven" "market development driven" and "market development driven - industrial robot driven", with each mode consisting of at least one to four equivalent pathways. (2) The marketization level and application of industrial robots are the important external and internal pulling forces that drive the synergy degree of digitalization and green change within manufacturing industry, respectively.(3) The influencing factors of the collaborative mode choice of digital-green development within manufacturing industry are complementary, among which, the degree of marketization is similar to the role of industrial robots in the configuration, which are capable to weaken the negative impact from insufficient government R&D investment support under specific conditions; (4) The non-high collaborative state of digital green in manufacturing industry is mainly due to the low level of marketization, openness, and economic development, as well as the low application rate of industrial robots and software products. This study enriches the theoretical understanding on digitalization and green change of manufacturing industry. Meanwhile, it also provides insights to advance the integrated and synergistic advancement of digital green transformation in manufacturing practice.

Keywords: Manufacturing industry; Digital transformation; Green transformation; Coupling coordination path; FsQCA;
Copyright: © 2024 by Jiang, Han and Qin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Funding

Guilin University of Technology Research Initial Fund "Research on the Long-term Mechanism of Ecological Industrialization in Guangxi Ethnic Poor Areas" (GUTQDJJ2018120)

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Jiang, H.; Han, Y.; Qin, Y. Influencing Factors as well as Implementation Path of Synergistic Development of Digitalization and Greening in Manufacturing Industry: Analysis from a Configuration Perspective. Review of Economic Assessment, 2024, 3, 26. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea03010004
AMA Style
Jiang H, Han Y, Qin Y. Influencing Factors as well as Implementation Path of Synergistic Development of Digitalization and Greening in Manufacturing Industry: Analysis from a Configuration Perspective. Review of Economic Assessment; 2024, 3(1):26. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea03010004
Chicago/Turabian Style
Jiang, Haiyong; Han, Yinghui; Qin, Yan 2024. "Influencing Factors as well as Implementation Path of Synergistic Development of Digitalization and Greening in Manufacturing Industry: Analysis from a Configuration Perspective" Review of Economic Assessment 3, no.1:26. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea03010004
APA style
Jiang, H., Han, Y., & Qin, Y. (2024). Influencing Factors as well as Implementation Path of Synergistic Development of Digitalization and Greening in Manufacturing Industry: Analysis from a Configuration Perspective. Review of Economic Assessment, 3(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea03010004

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Andersson, P.F. (2018). Democracy, urbanization, and tax revenue. Studies in Comparative International Development, 53, 111-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-017-9235-0
  2. Chen, C.L., Lin, Y.C., Chen, W. H., Chao, C. F., & Pandia, H. (2021). Role of government to enhance digital transformation in small service business. Sustainability,13(3),1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031028
  3. Cheng, Z., Li, L., & Liu, J. (2018). Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China's provinces. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,81, Part 2,2935-2946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.103
  4. Gnangnon, S.K., & Brun, J.F. (2019). Trade openness, tax reform and tax revenue in developing countries. The World Economy, 42(12), 3515-3536. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12858
  5. Goel, R.K., & Vishnoi, S. (2022). Urbanization and sustainable development for inclusiveness using ICTs. Telecommunications Policy,46,102311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102311
  6. Khaddage-Soboh, N., Safi, A., Rasheed, M.F., & Hasnaoui, A. (2023). Examining the role of natural resource rent, environmental regulations, and environmental taxes in sustainable development: Evidence from G-7 economies. Resources Policy, 86, Part A,104071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104071
  7. Lin, B., & Xie, Y. (2023). Impact assessment of digital transformation on the green innovation efficiency of China's manufacturing enterprises. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,105,107373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107373
  8. Loeser, F., Recker, J., Brocke, J. V., Molla, A., & Zarnekow, R. (2017). How IT executives create organizational benefits by translating environmental strategies into Green IS initiatives. Information Systems Journal, 27(4), 503-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12136
  9. Lee, J., Hwang, J., & Kim, H. (2022a). Different government support effects on emerging and mature ICT sectors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,174,121253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121253
  10. Lee, C.C., Qin, S., & Li, Y. (2022b). Does industrial robot application promote green technology innovation in the manufacturing industry?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,183,121893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121893
  11. Liu, L., Gu, T., & Wang, H. (2022). The coupling coordination between digital economy and industrial green high-quality development: Spatio-temporal characteristics, differences and convergence. Sustainability, 14(23), 16260. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316260
  12. Llopis-Albert, C., Rubio, F., & Valero, F. (2021). Impact of digital transformation on the automotive industry. Technological forecasting and social change, 162,120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120343
  13. Luo, Y., Cui, H., Zhong, H., & Wei, C. (2023). Business environment and enterprise digital transformation. Finance Research Letters, 57,104250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104250
  14. Mao, W.X., Wang, W.P., & Sun, H.F. (2019). Driving patterns of industrial green transformation: A multiple regions case learning from China. Science of the Total Environment,697, 134134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134134
  15. Meng, G.F., Guo, Z., & Li, J.L. (2021). The dynamic linkage among urbanization, industrialisation and carbon emissions in China: Insights from spatiotemporal effect. Science of the Total Environment,760, 144042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144042
  16. Pan, X., Wang, M., & Li, M. (2023). Low-carbon policy and industrial structure upgrading: Based on the perspective of strategic interaction among local governments. Energy Policy,183,113794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113794
  17. Rubio, F., Llopis-Albert, C., & Valero, F. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of costs and energy efficiency associated with autonomous industrial processes for sustainable growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121115
  18. Ran, Q., Yang, X., Yan, H., Xu, Y., & Cao, J. (2023). Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?. Resources Policy, 81, 103396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103396
  19. Radas, S., Ani´c, I.D., Tafro, A., & Wagner, V. (2015). The effects of public support schemes on small and medium enterprises. Technovation, 38, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.08.002
  20. Su, Y., & Fan, Q. (2022). Renewable energy technology innovation, industrial structure upgrading and green development fromthe perspective of China's provinces. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,180,121727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121727
  21. Song, L., & Zhou, X.L. (2021). Does the green industry policy reduce industrial pollution emissions?—Evidence from China’s national eco-industrial park.Sustainability,13,6343. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116343
  22. Tao, C.Q., Yi, M.Y., & Wang, C.S. (2023). Coupling coordination analysis and Spatiotemporal heterogeneity between data elements and green development in China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.10.014
  23. Tang, M., Li, Z., Hu, F., & Wu, B. (2020). How does land urbanization promote urban eco-efficiency? The mediating effect of industrial structure advancement. Journal of Cleaner Production,272,122798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122798
  24. Wang, J., Wang, W., Wu, H., & Liu, Y. (2023). Exploring the effects of manufacturing servitization on enterprise energy conservation and emissions reduction moderated by digital transformation. Energy Economics,122,106706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106706
  25. Wang, Y., & Su, X. (2021a). Driving factors of digital transformation for manufacturing enterprises: A multi-case study from China. International Journal of Technology Management, 87(2-4), 229-253. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2021.120932
  26. Wang, X., Wang, Q. (2021b). Research on the impact of green finance on the upgrading of China's regional industrial structure from the perspective of sustainable development. Resources Policy,74,102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102436
  27. Wang, Z., Li, X., Xue, X., & Liu, Y. (2022). More government subsidies, more green innovation? The evidence from Chinese new energy vehicle enterprises. Renewable Energy,197,11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.086
  28. Ye, F., Zheng, J., Li, Y., Li, L., & Linghu, D. (2024). Exploring the fusion of greening and digitalization for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production,442,141085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141085
  29. Yang, X., Liu, C., & Wei, Q. (2024). Sustainable digital transformation path for manufacturing outwards foreign direct investment firms: Gradual or leapfrogging. Heliyon,10(3), e24889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24889
  30. Zhao, S., Zhang, L., An, H., Peng, L., Zhou, H., & Hu, F. (2023). Has China's low-carbon strategy pushed forward the digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises? Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot policy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,102,107184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107184
  31. Zhang, F., Yang, B., & Zhu, L. (2023a). Digital technology usage, strategic flexibility, and business model innovation in traditional manufacturing firms: The moderating role of the institutional environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,194,122726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122726
  32. Zhou, L., Zhou, C.H., Che, L., & Wang, B. (2020). Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences,30, 724-742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-020-1752-5
  33. Zhai, X., & An, Y. (2020). Analyzing influencing factors of green transformation in China’s manufacturing industry under environmental regulation: A structural equation model. Journal of Cleaner Production,251,119760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119760
  34. Zhang, J., Chen, X., & Zhao, X. (2023b). A perspective of government investment and enterprise innovation: Marketization of business environment. Journal of Business Research,164,113925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113925
  35. Zhang, W., Xu, N., Li, C., Cui, X., Zhang, H., & Chen, W. (2023c). Impact of digital input on enterprise green productivity: Micro evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production,414,137272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137272
  36. Zeng, W., Li, L., & Huang, Y. (2021). Industrial collaborative agglomeration, marketization, and green innovation: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data. Journal of Cleaner Production,279,123598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123598
  37. Zhang, L., Pan, A., Feng, S., & Qin, Y. (2022). Digital economy, technological progress, and city export trade. Public Library of Science ONE, 17(6), e0269314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269314